Meander scentsy warmer12/27/2023 "Is it so burdensome to ask that a few more drugs be done? No, it's not."ĭespite Doggett's plea, most House Democrats on the committee followed Neal's lead in rejecting the amendments. "The chances that the typical patient will see their prices lowered are akin to winning the lottery," Doggett said. would benefit from the lower negotiated rates. If adopted, Doggett's amendments would have raised the minimum number of drugs the government would be required to negotiate under the legislation from 35 to 50 and guaranteed that the approximately 30 million people without health insurance in the U.S. 3, introduced amendments anyway during the marathon hearing. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas), the author of a more ambitious drug pricing bill that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in April brushed aside in favor of the more moderate H.R. "We intend to stick with the measure in front of us," Neal told The Hill.īut Rep. Is it so burdensome to ask that a few more drugs be done? No, it's not." "The chances that the typical patient will see their prices lowered are akin to winning the lottery. 3) during the committee's markup of the legislation on Tuesday. The Intercept reported Wednesday that Neal, a Massachusetts Democrat and chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, warned his Democratic colleagues against offering any amendments to the Lower Drug Costs Now Act of 2019 (H.R. Richard Neal, Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee this week crushed several progressive amendments to a House drug pricing bill that would have expanded the number of medicines covered by the legislation and extended lower costs to the nation's tens of millions of uninsured. Following the lead of pharma-friendly Rep.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |